A couple of key notes.
- First, the fact that not many in America jump up at salespeople and other performance jobs getting performance-based pay.
- Second, the reference that there is at best a weak effect between credentials and effectiveness. There is also an effect of experience in the classroom (seniority) that disappears after the first few years.
- The author proposes we simply take an intermediate step of NOT paying for seniority or meaningless credentials, reallocating these funds to starting salaries and such.
Let me first say that whenever I hear teachers unions and “old hands” being against merit pay, it always has seemed like they’re scared–of losing their pay and even their jobs. Don’t get me wrong–the excuse generally given is absolutely valid: evaluation-based pay could easily be subject to favoritism and politics, and I certainly don’t give our nation’s school administration enough credit to think they’d all be above that.
But do we think that would be the norm? One would hope that the system would not be taken advantage of so either because we [American society, specifically school administrators] are generally moral and honest people or because it would be more trouble than it was worth to the administrator’s who would take advantage.
Unfortunately, unions leadership and even membership is heavily skewed towards teachers with better seniority, so they of course advocate for things that benefit them–and who would blame them? It’s the same idea of why so little (yes, I said little) education funding is available to states and schools–most voters are senior citizens with students out of public school already, so why waste money on something that many don’t believe affect them anymore?
Yet at the same time, isn’t this akin to board members voting to increase their pay (or the cause of an even bigger potential outcry: senators proposing to raise their own pay when the country is becoming broke)? There’s a definite moral issue here but few [of the normal US electorate] are up in arms about it
What I found really interesting was the coherent idea of ignoring pointless certificates. This money could again, relocate to needed area like base starting teacher salary. There would also be great side-effects: fewer teachers going through the motions of such a program would leave more time to themselves, and it would save a bit of administrative costs.
Hm, I just nodded off for a moment so I’m going to bed now and will finish this post and muse on the week on Thursday and Friday.